If a material is deformed beyond its elastic limit, it will retain some deformation even after all external forces are removed. When this happens, the material is described as plastic. Many substances, such as clay, putty, and ductile metals, become plastic when stress exceeds a certain threshold. Conversely, the concept of plastic deformation generally does not apply to brittle materials, which fracture rather than stretch when forces reach a limit. Notably, while fracture is induced by normal stresses, plastic deformation is primarily driven by shear stresses.
Modeling and understanding plastic deformation is significantly more complex than linear elasticity for several reasons:
- Nonlinearity: Plastic deformation is inherently nonlinear. In mathematics and physics, nonlinear systems are generally more difficult to solve than linear ones, much like how nonlinear differential equations are far harder to solve than linear differential equations. While there are established methods for solving systems of linear equations, no such universal method exists for nonlinear equations.
- Path Dependence: In linear elasticity, stress is uniquely determined by the current strain. However, in plasticity, a single strain state can be associated with various stress values depending on the loading history. Because the material behavior is path-dependent, we cannot simply relate total stress to total strain; instead, we must relate increments of stress to increments of strain.
- Constitutive Variability: Plastic behavior varies fundamentally from one material to another. Also various parameters, such as temperature, loading rate, and grain size, can fundamentally alter a material's plastic behavior. In contrast, linear elasticity is uniform across materials, differing only by their compliance constants (the slope of the stress-strain curve).
- Irreversibility and Energy Dissipation: Elastic deformation is a conservative process; the energy stored in the material is essentially a potential energy that is fully recoverable upon unloading. Plastic deformation, however, is dissipative. Energy is permanently lost (mostly converted to heat) and cannot be recovered. This means plastic modeling must satisfy strict thermodynamic laws to ensure that the model is physically valid, adding a layer of thermodynamic complexity that is not present in elasticity.
-
Geometric Nonlinearity and Large Deformations: In linear elasticity, deformations are assumed to be infinitesimal. This allows for major simplifications: equilibrium is calculated on the original shape, and all stress/strain definitions essentially coincide. In plasticity, these assumptions break down due to large stretches and rotations, introducing three layers of complexity:
- Distinction of Configurations: Because the geometry changes significantly, we cannot assume a fixed shape. We must strictly distinguish between the
reference (undeformed) configuration and thecurrent (deformed) configuration, and enforce equilibrium on a continuously moving and deforming body. - Multiplicity of Stress and Strain Measures:
While a single definition suffices for small strains, large deformations require specific measures to ensure physical accuracy and energy balance (work conjugacy):
- Cauchy Stress: Defined on the
current configuration (force per current area). - Piola-Kirchhoff Stresses: Mapped back to the
reference configuration. The 1st Piola-Kirchhoff relates current force to original area, while the 2nd Piola-Kirchhoff transforms the force vector itself to account for material rotation. - Conjugacy:Each stress measure must be paired with a mathematically corresponding strain rate to ensure the calculation of internal work is correct.
- Cauchy Stress: Defined on the
- Distinction of Configurations: Because the geometry changes significantly, we cannot assume a fixed shape. We must strictly distinguish between the