How to Evaluate Limits

To evaluate lim x a f ( x ) , first try substituting x = a directly. If you get an indeterminate form, apply one of the four algebraic techniques described in this section.

Technique When to use
Direct substitution Always try first; works when f is continuous at a
Factoring 0 / 0 form with polynomial numerator and denominator
Rationalizing 0 / 0 form involving a square root that vanishes
Common denominator form involving fractions
Leading term ± / ± or ± for polynomials/rational functions

Step 1: Try Direct Substitution

To evaluate lim x a f ( x ) , first try putting x = a into f ( x ) . If f is continuous at a , then lim x a f ( x ) = f ( a ) and you are done. Be careful with piecewise-defined functions, where direct substitution may give the wrong answer at a break point.

If substitution gives one of the indeterminate forms

0 0 , ± ± , 0 ( ± ) , ,

then proceed to one of the techniques below. (The most powerful technique, L'Hôpital's Rule, is covered in the Applications of Differentiation chapter.)

Technique 1: Factoring

Factoring technique: If P ( x ) and Q ( x ) are polynomials and P ( a ) = Q ( a ) = 0 , then ( x a ) is a common factor of both. Factor out ( x a ) , cancel it from numerator and denominator, then substitute.

  • If factoring ( x a ) directly is difficult, you can divide both P ( x ) and Q ( x ) by ( x a ) using polynomial long division.

Find lim x 2 x 2 4 3 x 6 .

Solution Substituting x = 2 gives 0 / 0 . Since both x 2 4 and 3 x 6 vanish at x = 2 , factor out ( x 2 ) : x 2 4 = ( x 2 ) ( x + 2 ) , 3 x 6 = 3 ( x 2 ) . Therefore: \lim_{x \to 2} \frac{x^2-4}{3x-6} = \lim_{x \to 2} \frac{\cancel{(x-2)}(x+2)}{3\cancel{(x-2)}} = \frac{1}{3}\lim_{x \to 2}(x+2) = \frac{1}{3}(4) = \frac{4}{3}.

Find lim x 1 x 3 1 2 x 2 + x 3 .

Solution Substituting x = 1 gives 0 / 0 . Use the Difference of Cubes formula A 3 B 3 = ( A B ) ( A 2 + A B + B 2 ) : x 3 1 = ( x 1 ) ( x 2 + x + 1 ) . For the denominator, since x = 1 is a root of 2 x 2 + x 3 , ( x 1 ) is a factor. Comparing 2 x 2 + x 3 = ( x 1 ) ( a x + b ) = a x 2 + ( b a ) x b , we get a = 2 , b = 3 : 2 x 2 + x 3 = ( x 1 ) ( 2 x + 3 ) . Therefore: \frac{x^3-1}{2x^2+x-3} = \frac{\cancel{(x-1)}(x^2+x+1)}{\cancel{(x-1)}(2x+3)} = \frac{x^2+x+1}{2x+3} \quad (x \neq 1). Now substitute x = 1 : lim x 1 x 2 + x + 1 2 x + 3 = 1 + 1 + 1 2 + 3 = 3 5 .

Technique 2: Rationalizing

Rationalizing technique: If the limit has the indeterminate form 0 / 0 and the numerator or denominator contains an expression of the form A B C that vanishes upon substitution, multiply both numerator and denominator by the conjugate A + B C and use ( A B C ) ( A + B C ) = A 2 B 2 C .

Find lim x 4 x 2 16 3 x 2 7 .

Solution Substituting x = 4 gives 0 / 0 . Multiply numerator and denominator by the conjugate 3 + x 2 7 : \begin{aligned} \lim_{x \to -4} \frac{x^2-16}{3-\sqrt{x^2-7}} &= \lim_{x \to -4} \frac{(x^2-16)(3+\sqrt{x^2-7})}{3^2-(x^2-7)} \\ &= \lim_{x \to -4} \frac{(x^2-16)(3+\sqrt{x^2-7})}{16-x^2} \\ &= \lim_{x \to -4} \bigl(-3-\sqrt{x^2-7}\bigr) \\ &= -3 - \sqrt{16-7} = -3 - 3 = -6. \end{aligned}

Technique 3: Common Denominator

Common denominator technique: If the limit of f ± g has the indeterminate form and f , g are fractions, find a common denominator, combine into one fraction, and simplify.

Find lim x 1 ( 2 x 2 1 1 x 1 ) .

Solution As x 1 + , both 2 x 2 1 and 1 x 1 approach + , giving . As x 1 , both approach , giving ( ) . Use the common denominator x 2 1 = ( x 1 ) ( x + 1 ) : \begin{aligned} \lim_{x \to 1}\!\left(\frac{2}{x^2-1} - \frac{1}{x-1}\right) &= \lim_{x \to 1} \frac{2 - (x+1)}{(x-1)(x+1)} = \lim_{x \to 1} \frac{1-x}{(x-1)(x+1)} \\ &= \lim_{x \to 1} \frac{-\cancel{(x-1)}}{\cancel{(x-1)}(x+1)} = \lim_{x \to 1} \frac{-1}{x+1} = -\frac{1}{2}. \end{aligned}

Technique 4: Leading Term (for x ± )

Leading term technique: When x is numerically large ( x + or x ), the behavior of a polynomial or rational function is determined entirely by its leading term.

For polynomials ( a n 0 ):

lim x ± ( a n x n + a n 1 x n 1 + + a 0 ) = lim x ± a n x n .

For rational functions ( a n 0 , b m 0 ):

lim x ± a n x n + + a 0 b m x m + + b 0 = lim x ± a n x n b m x m .

Find lim x ( 3 x 5 8 x 2 + 37 ) .

Solution Factor out the highest power x 5 : \begin{aligned} \lim_{x \to -\infty}(-3x^5 - 8x^2 + 37) &= \lim_{x \to -\infty} x^5\!\left(-3 - \frac{8}{x^3} + \frac{37}{x^5}\right) \\ &= \left(\lim_{x \to -\infty} x^5\right)\!\left(-3 - 0 + 0\right) \\ &= (-\infty)(-3) = +\infty. \end{aligned}

Find:

  1. lim x 3 x 3 4 x 2 + x + 3 x 3 + 2 x 2
  2. lim x + 13 x 4 5 x 3 + 4 x + 15 x 5 + 16 x 2 + 1
Solution **(a)** Factor out x 3 from numerator and denominator: lim x x 3 ( 3 4 / x + 1 / x 2 + 3 / x 3 ) x 3 ( 1 + 2 / x ) = 3 0 + 0 + 0 1 + 0 = 3. Using the leading-term shortcut directly: lim x 3 x 3 x 3 = 3 . **(b)** Keep only leading terms: lim x + 13 x 4 x 5 = lim x + 13 x = 0.

Frequently Asked Questions

What do I do if none of the four techniques work? If factoring, rationalizing, common denominator, and leading-term techniques all fail to resolve an indeterminate form, the most powerful remaining tool is **L'Hôpital's Rule**, which handles 0 / 0 and ± / ± by differentiating numerator and denominator separately. This is covered in the Applications of Differentiation chapter.

When I factor and cancel ( x a ) , am I changing the function? Strictly speaking, yes: the simplified expression differs from the original at x = a (the original is undefined there; the simplified one may be defined). However, the limit as x a is unchanged, because limits ignore what happens at x = a exactly. So the cancellation is valid for the purpose of evaluating the limit.

How do I evaluate a limit involving x as x ? Factor out the appropriate power of x from under the radical. For example, to find lim x 4 x 4 + 3 x 2 + 1 1 2 x 2 , factor x 4 from inside the square root: 4 x 4 + 3 x 2 + 1 = x 2 4 + 3 / x 2 + 1 / x 4 (note: x 4 = x 2 since x 2 0 ). Then simplify.