In this section, we introduce the concept of a limit intuitively. We examine how a function behaves near a given input value using numerical values, graphical illustrations, and algebraic simplification.
Quick Reference
| Concept | Symbolic Notation | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Intuitive Limit | As x approaches a (with ), gets close to . | |
| Dynamic Notation | as | Alternative notation for describing the limiting behavior. |
| Uniqueness Theorem | If a limit exists, its value is unique. | |
| Loss of Significance | Numerical Rounding Error | Subtraction of nearly equal numbers in finite-precision computing can generate false limits. |
Consider the function f defined by the equation
The function f is defined for all values of x except because the substitution of in the expression for yields the undefined fraction . But because , if , we can simplify the fraction as
So the graph of f is the line with one point removed, namely . This point is shown as a hole in the following figure.
Now let's investigate the values of f when x is close to 1 but not equal to 1. Let x take on the values , and so on, or take on the values , and so on. The corresponding values of f are shown in the following table.

From this table and graph of f, we see that as x gets closer and closer to 1 (on either side of 1), but not equal to 1, gets closer and closer to 4; the closer x is to 1, the closer is to 4. More specifically, we can make the values of as close to 4 as we desire by taking x close enough to 1. We express this by saying that "the limit of as x approaches 1 is 4" or simply " approaches 4 as x approaches 1," and express it symbolically as
or
In general:
Intuitive Definition of a Limit: If we can make the values of as close as we please to a number by taking x sufficiently close (but not equal) to a, we say "the limit of as x approaches a is " and write
or
According to the above definition, x approaches a but , so the non-existence or existence of or its value (if it exists) has no bearing on the existence or on the value of . For example, if we define the function g as
g(x) = \begin{cases} \dfrac{2x^2 - 2}{x - 1} & \text{if } x \neq 1 \\[6pt] 3 & \text{if } x = 1 \end{cases}then and are basically the same except when ; therefore, because , we have
Numerical and Graphical Approaches
For now, to evaluate the limits, we use numerical and graphical approaches.
Evaluate numerically.
Solution
Let x approach from both sides:

As the above table shows and as we expect from the graph of (see the following figure), as x approaches , approaches .

Evaluate numerically.
Solution
Let's choose some values of x close to 2 and calculate the corresponding values of . The results are tabulated in the following table.

It appears as if were approaching the limit . To verify this, we factor the numerator and simplify the fraction as
From this, it appears that can be made as near as we please by taking x sufficiently close to 2 (see the following figure). Hence is the limit of as x approaches 2.

Evaluate numerically.
Solution
Again we note that the function is not defined at , but we can construct the following table by choosing some values of x close to 0 and calculating the corresponding values of . Recall that means the angle x is measured in radians, so you need to set your calculator in radian mode.

The graph of is shown below. From the above table and this figure, we may conclude that

When the Numerical Approach Fails
In the previous examples, we used a calculator/computer to numerically evaluate the values of the given function for x near the given point. However, in some cases, computers may give false results. Here is an example of such a situation.
Use the numerical approach to evaluate .
Solution
The function
is not defined when . Let's construct a table to list the values of for several values of x near 0.

From this table, we may conclude that
We might be tempted to choose some values of x closer to 0. Let's try it out.


The values in the above table are given by WolframAlpha.com. If you use a calculator, you might get different values, but eventually, you will get 0 if you make x sufficiently close to zero. Do these calculations show us the limit is 0 instead of ? Let's graph this function. Again it seems that the limit is .

Let's zoom in and graph this function again for values of x closer to 0.

What is the reason for this strange behavior? This behavior originates from the fact that calculators and computers retain only a fixed number of digits during a calculation. For example, if a calculator stores only 4 significant digits, then 0.34246 and 0.34254 are both stored as 0.3425. In this specific example, when x is very close to 0, is so close to 1 that the computer cannot distinguish between them. This undesirable effect is called loss of significance. It almost always occurs when subtracting two nearly equal numbers. Ways to avoid loss of significance are studied in numerical methods.
Here, we can multiply both the numerator and the denominator by the conjugate of the numerator:
\begin{aligned} \frac{1 - \sqrt{1 + x^6}}{x^6} &= \frac{1 - \sqrt{1 + x^6}}{x^6} \frac{1 + \sqrt{1 + x^6}}{1 + \sqrt{1 + x^6}} \\ &= \frac{1 - \left(\sqrt{1 + x^6}\right)^2}{x^6 \left(1 + \sqrt{1 + x^6}\right)} \\ &= \frac{1 - (1 + x^6)}{x^6 \left(1 + \sqrt{1 + x^6}\right)} \\ &= \frac{-x^6}{x^6 (1 + \sqrt{1 + x^6})} \\ &= -\frac{1}{1 + \sqrt{1 + x^6}} \end{aligned}Note that
are equal except when because the first one is not defined for but the second one is. The following table lists the values of for several points approaching .

Calculations with WolframAlpha.com and the graph of are shown below.

Now let's consider the sign function .
Let the sign function be defined by
\operatorname{sgn}(x) = \begin{cases} 1 & \text{if } x > 0 \\ 0 & \text{if } x = 0 \\ -1 & \text{if } x < 0 \end{cases}.Find .
Solution
The graph of this function is shown below. When x approaches 0 through positive numbers, approaches 1. Although for every , we still say approaches 1 through positive numbers (or from the right).
When x approaches 0 through negative numbers, approaches . Therefore, there is no single number that approaches as x approaches 0 from either side. Therefore, does not exist.
In general, the limit of as x approaches a number a (if it exists) is unique, because for all x near a, cannot be near two different numbers at the same time.
Uniqueness of a Limit Theorem: If and , then .
The precise definition of this theorem once the precise definition of a limit is explained is not difficult.