The definite integral inherits its algebra from the summation process. Sums add, constants factor out, and inequalities are preserved, so integrals do all three as well.
| Property | Name | Condition |
|---|---|---|
| Sum Rule | Both integrals exist | |
| Constant Multiple Rule | c constant, not a function of x | |
| Constant Function Rule | c constant | |
| Additivity Rule | Holds whether c is inside or outside | |
| Positivity Rule | ||
| Comparison Rule | ||
| Bounding Rule | on , |
In this section, we prove some key properties of definite integrals that will help us evaluate them in an easy way. Most of these properties are analogous to the properties of the summation process.
The Four Algebraic Properties
- , where c is a constant.
In particular, . - , where c is a constant.
- , whether c is between a and b or outside.
Property 1: The Sum Rule
Property (1) says that the integral of a sum is the sum of the separate integrals. The truth of this formula follows at once from the definition of the definite integral and the corresponding property of the summation process:

Property 2: The Constant Multiple Rule
Property (2) says that we can move a constant factor outside the integral sign. Note that c must be a constant, not a function of x. To prove it, we use the definition of the definite integral and the following property of sums:
Together, Properties 1 and 2 say that the definite integral is a linear operation. In practice, this is what lets us break a complicated integrand into manageable pieces.
Property 3: The Constant Function Rule
Property (3) says that the integral of a constant function from a to b is . This is expected, because if , the signed area of the shaded rectangle in the figure is (height) (width) . If is negative, the rectangle lies below the axis and the signed area is negative, exactly as the formula reports.

Property 4: The Additivity Rule
Property (4) says that to integrate a function from a to b, we can integrate it once from a to c, once from c to b, and then add the results together.
If , the truth of Property (4) can be shown graphically. It is also easy to see from the definition of the definite integral that in this case

What is less obvious is that the rule still holds when c lies outside . Suppose . From the case just proved,
\int_{a}^{c}f(x)\,dx=\int_{a}^{b}f(x)\,dx+\int_{b}^{c}f(x)\,dx. \tag{i}Because we defined
we can rewrite (i) as
Taking the last integral to the left, we get
The truth of the other cases, for example if , can be shown similarly. This is the payoff of the reversal rule from the previous section: once signed intervals are allowed, additivity holds with no restriction on the position of c.
In an example in the previous section, we found . Use the properties of the definite integral to evaluate
Solution
\begin{aligned} \int_{1}^{3}(2-5x^{2})\,dx &=\int_{1}^{3}2\,dx+\int_{1}^{3}-5x^{2}\,dx &&{\small(\text{Property 1})}\\ &=\int_{1}^{3}2\,dx-5\int_{1}^{3}x^{2}\,dx &&{\small(\text{Property 2})}\\ &=2(3-1)-5\times\frac{26}{3} &&{\small(\text{Property 3 and the given integral})}\\ &=4-\frac{130}{3}\\ &=-\frac{118}{3}. \end{aligned}Find , given that and .
Solution
Using Property 4, we have
Therefore,
The Inequality Properties
- If for , then .
- If for , then .
Property (5), the Positivity Rule, says that if the graph of does not lie below the -axis, the signed area of the region lying between the curve and the -axis is nonnegative.
Rigorously: if , then each term in is nonnegative (because ), and so is its limit as .

Property (6), the Comparison Rule, follows immediately: because , Property 5 gives , and Properties 1 and 2 let us split that into .
- If for , then
Property (7), the Bounding Rule, is the Comparison Rule applied twice, once against the constant function and once against the constant function . Geometrically it says that the region under the curve contains the rectangle of height and is contained in the rectangle of height , both on the same base of width .

This property is genuinely useful: it produces numerical bounds for integrals we cannot evaluate at all.
Show that
Solution
Because on the interval , the maximum value of on is and the minimum is . That is,
It follows from Property (7), with , , and , that
The actual value of the integral is
which indeed lies between the two bounds.

Use Property (7) to estimate the integral
Solution
On the exponent runs from (at ) up to (at ), and is increasing in t. Hence
so that
The actual value of this integral is approximately . Notice how wide the bracket is: the Bounding Rule is cheap but crude, because it replaces the function by its extreme values across the whole interval.

Exercises
Given and , evaluate
(a)
(b)
(c)
Answer
(a) (b) (c)
Solution
(a) By Properties 1 and 2, .
(b) By Properties 1 and 3, .
(c) First reverse the limits, then factor the constant: .
Given and , find and .
Answer
and respectively.
Solution
By the Additivity Rule, , so and . Reversing the limits changes the sign, giving .
Suppose and . Find .
Answer
Solution
Additivity gives , so and . Reversing the limits,
Note that came out negative even though nothing was said about the sign of h; the properties do all the work without any picture.
Use the Bounding Rule to show that
and compare with the exact value.
Answer
The exact value is , comfortably inside .
Solution
On the denominator satisfies , so the integrand satisfies
With , , and , Property 7 gives .
The exact value is .
Without evaluating either integral, decide which is larger:
Then decide the same question on the interval .
Answer
On the integral of is larger; on the integral of is larger.
Solution
For we have , since multiplying by a number less than 1 shrinks it. The Comparison Rule then gives .
For the inequality reverses: , so .
(For confirmation, the four values are , , , and .)
Show that , and find an upper bound for the same integral.
Answer
.
Solution
On we have , hence and, taking square roots (which preserves the inequality for nonnegative numbers),
By Property 7 with , the integral lies between and .
The lower bound can also be obtained from the Comparison Rule directly: and .
Explain why the following calculation is wrong, and give the correct value:
Answer
The Constant Multiple Rule applies only to constants, not to x. The correct value is .
Solution
Property 2 permits pulling out a factor only if that factor does not depend on the variable of integration. Here the factor pulled out is itself, which varies over the interval, so the step is invalid. A second warning sign is that the "answer" still contains , whereas a definite integral is always a number.
Correctly, and
Suppose is continuous on , that there, and that with . What can you conclude about ?
Answer
for every in .
Solution
Suppose, to the contrary, that for some in . Because is continuous, there is a small interval around inside on which .
Splitting the integral with the Additivity Rule and using positivity on the outer pieces,
where the last inequality is the Bounding Rule. This contradicts the assumption that the integral is zero. Hence no such exists and is identically zero.
Continuity is essential: a function that is zero everywhere except at a single point still has integral zero without being identically zero.
Prove the inequality
Answer
Apply the Comparison Rule to the double inequality .
Solution
For every , the number satisfies
Integrating each part from a to b and using the Comparison Rule twice,
where the left-hand integral was rewritten with Property 2. A quantity trapped between and has absolute value at most , so
Interpreted geometrically, this says the net area can never exceed the total area, which is the integral version of the triangle inequality.
A continuous function satisfies on . What are the smallest and largest possible values of , and what does each extreme case require of ?
Answer
Between and ; the extremes occur only for the constant functions and .
Solution
Here , so Property 7 gives
The upper bound is attained only if equals 5 throughout. Indeed, if , then with a continuous, nonnegative integrand, so by the previous exercise . The same argument with handles the lower bound.