Let be defined on an interval containing , and assume now that is defined. Then we say that is continuous at if
or in other words, if for every we can find a such that whenever , then
This is the precise way of saying " is near when is near ", or that "a small change in produces only a small change in ." Note, however, that it is not the change in that we start with, but rather the number , which is to be a bound for the change in . Then we find an interval about , of length , such that if is in this interval, i.e., is not farther than away from , then is not farther away from than the given bound . It is only by this type of definition that we can be sure of meeting the challenge of a man who says, "I don't call near until it is within ", a second one who says "Near means to me within ", and so on. Thus in order to show that a given function is continuous at , we must start with a symbol , representing a general positive number, and then show that we can find a positive number , which will usually depend on , such that the inequality gives us some information about the expression , namely that it is less than . To prove that is not continuous at , it would suffice to demonstrate just one for which we could not find a suitable . (Of course, then we could not find a suitable for any smaller .)
Let us illustrate by discussing some examples:
. If you recheck our proof that a differentiable function is continuous, you will see that it is completely rigorous in terms of the definitions and the theorems about limits which we have now given. However, let us prove that is continuous at using only the definition of continuity.
Let be given. Then we must study . Let us write . Then
Now let us take . Then if ,
Since , we see that whenever , we have , and thus that is continuous at
Our second example will seem somewhat more bizarre. Let be defined for as follows:
If is irrational, .
If in lowest terms (, , and integers), then
For example,
, , , ,
First of all, is not continuous at if is a rational number; for if in lowest terms, . In every interval about we have irrational numbers , where . Therefore, if we tried , we could not find a suitable . Now we show that is continuous at if is any irrational number; then . Let be given, and find an integer such that Now there are in the interval only a finite number of rational numbers which, in lowest terms, have denominators less than ; there are two with denominator , one with denominator , two with denominator , two with denominator , four with denominator In general, except for denominator , there at most with denominator (and this is only achieved if is prime). Therefore those with denominator less than are at most
in number. Some one of these, say , is therefore closest to . Let , since is irrational. Now let . If is irrational, then . If is rational, we know that , or . Thus , and we have proved that is continuous at .
EXERCISES
Prove that is continuous at .
Prove that is continuous at .
Prove that
f(x) = \begin{cases} x \sin \dfrac{1}{x}, & x \neq 0 \\ 0, & x = 0 \end{cases}is continuous at .
Prove that is continuous at if is not an integer, and that it is not continuous at if is an integer.
Prove the following, assuming that and are continuous at :
a) is continuous at .
b) is continuous at , where is a constant.
c) is continuous at .
d) If is continuous at .
Write out in formal language the proof that if f'(x_0) exists, then is continuous at .