Historical Perspective on Complex Numbers

Quick Reference

Number System	Introduced to solve	Example equation
Natural numbers	Counting
Rational numbers
Irrational / Real
Negative numbers
Complex numbers	, cubic equations

A Brief History of Numbers

The earliest numbers, the natural numbers , arose from the simple need to count. As societies developed, the need to divide quantities and express ratios led to the positive rational numbers, allowing solutions to equations like . For a long time, ancient Greek mathematicians believed that all lengths could be expressed as such ratios.

This worldview was shattered by the Pythagorean theorem. When applied to a right triangle with sides of length 1, it revealed a hypotenuse of length , a number that cannot be written as a fraction . The discovery of irrational numbers like and expanded the number system to what we now call the real numbers.

Even then, the system was incomplete. Equations like required the introduction of negative numbers. At first, these were met with suspicion, dismissed as "fictitious" or "absurd" since concepts like length could not be negative. It was not until the development of the coordinate system in the 17th century, where numbers could represent positions on a line, that negative numbers gained full acceptance.

At each stage, a new type of number was introduced to fill a gap, expanding the mathematical toolkit. Yet one barrier remained.

The Problem That Forced a New Kind of Number

Since antiquity, mathematicians knew how to solve quadratic equations using the quadratic formula. However, if the discriminant was negative, they simply declared that the equation had no solution. The idea of taking the square root of a negative number was considered a logical impossibility.

This is where the story takes an unexpected turn. The motivation for complex numbers did not come from quadratic equations, which could be conveniently dismissed, but from cubic equations.

For centuries, efforts to find a general solution for cubic equations failed. Then, in the 16th century, a breakthrough occurred. A formula was discovered that could solve the "depressed" cubic equation :

This formula, known as Cardano's formula, seemed to be a complete triumph. However, it harbored a perplexing secret.

Bombelli's Breakthrough

Consider the equation . By inspection, is a root, and factoring gives:

Solving the quadratic factor yields three real solutions:

All three solutions are real numbers. However, when Cardano's formula is applied to (with and ), the result is:

To find the real solutions, the formula forces a journey through a world of square roots of negative numbers. Undeterred, mathematicians like Gerolamo Cardano and Raffaele Bombelli decided to proceed as if were a valid number. By substituting , the expression becomes:

This expression seems meaningless. However, by treating like any other algebraic quantity, something remarkable emerged. Using the binomial expansion , one can show that:

And similarly:

Substituting these back into equation (1) yields a stunning result:

The formula worked. The "imaginary" journey led to a real answer. This was the moment of conception for complex numbers. They were born not out of a desire to solve , but from the necessity of finding real solutions to cubic equations.

The Road to Acceptance

For two centuries after Bombelli, these "imaginary" numbers were used as a clever algebraic trick, with no one quite sure what they meant. It was not until the late 18th and early 19th centuries that Caspar Wessel, Jean-Robert Argand, and Carl Friedrich Gauss gave them a solid geometric foundation with the complex plane. Gauss popularized the term complex number for quantities of the form , cementing their place as a natural and essential extension of the real numbers.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why did cubic equations force the invention of complex numbers when quadratic equations did not?

With quadratic equations, if the discriminant was negative, mathematicians could simply say "no real solutions exist" and move on. But with cubic equations, the situation was different. Cardano's formula sometimes produced square roots of negative numbers even when the equation was known to have three real solutions. Ignoring those intermediate "imaginary" quantities would mean discarding the only known formula for cubics. Mathematicians were forced to work with them and verify that the imaginary parts cancelled out at the end.

Who first used the symbol for ?

The notation for was popularized by Leonhard Euler in the 18th century, though it took time to become standard. Before Euler, various symbols and phrases were used. The word "imaginary" dates to Descartes in the 17th century, who used it dismissively. The rigorous geometric foundation came later with Wessel, Argand, and Gauss around 1800.

What is Cardano's formula and why is it important?

Cardano's formula solves the depressed cubic . Any general cubic can be reduced to this form by substitution. The formula is important historically because it was the first general algebraic formula for polynomial equations of degree higher than 2, and because it made the use of complex numbers unavoidable.

Were negative numbers also once considered "fictitious"?

Yes. Negative numbers were called "fictitious" or "absurd" for several centuries before gaining full acceptance. The parallel with complex numbers is instructive: in both cases, the initial resistance gave way as mathematicians found that the new numbers followed consistent rules and were genuinely useful. The expansion of the number system follows a recognizable pattern throughout history.